- 1、本内容来自版权合作机构,您在本站购买的阅读使用权仅限于您本人阅读使用,您不得/不能给任何第三方使用,由此造成的一切相关后果本平台保留向您追偿索赔的权利!版权所有,后果自负!
- 2、本文档为正版电子图书,虚拟物品付费之后概不接收任何理由退款。
查看更多
2009年浙江大学714英语语言与语言学考研真题及部分详解
Part 1
Section A
Directio: Read the following two texts. Awer the
questio below each text by choosing A, B, C or D. Mark your awe on ANSWER
SHEET 1. (20 points)
Passage 1
Food companies have long wanted more freedom to make
nutritional claims for their products. They looked on enviously as make of
dietary supplements, which operated under looser regulatio, promoted the
life-enhancing or even life-extending capabilities of their products.
After several court cases and pressure from the food
industry, the Food and Drug Administration lightened up last year, deciding to
permit health claims on food even when scientific evidence was less than
conclusive. But getting what you want, as John Stuart Mill once observed, does
not always turn out to be so satisfying.
So far, the agency has approved claims for walnuts and for
a group of seven types of nuts. All of the nuts are said to have the potential
to reduce the risk of heart disease.
Some companies seeking the new claims, however, are
disappointed by the language that the agency has allowed, and have been slow to
use it. Few nut brands have relabeled their packaging, but Plante, a unit of
Kraft Foods, has been using the language on some of its dry-roasted peanuts.
Markete of walnuts received permission to make health
claims last July, and the FDA told the companies that they could put this
language on their products: “Supportive but not conclusive research shows that
eating 1.5 ounces per day of walnuts as part of a diet low in fat and
cholesterol may reduce the risk of heart disease.”
Now, eight months after the approval, few if any walnut
products carry a printed health claim. Coumer research by the walnut
commission, which represents more than 5,000 growe and handle, suggested
that the claim would do little to promote sales. “When you tell the coumer
‘supportive but not conclusive’ and ‘may’amp;#8212;with all those qualifie, the claim
is not very meaningful,” Mr. Balint, chi
您可能关注的文档
- 2024年心理学(基本理论)考研真题与典型题详解.pdf
- 河南财经政法大学《434国际商务专业基础》[专业硕士]历年考研真题及详解.pdf
- 2023年新日本语能力考试N5题库【官方样题+章节题库+模拟试题】.pdf
- 平新乔《微观经济学十八讲》课后习题和强化习题详解【赠两套模拟试题及详解】.pdf
- 四川外国语大学《815日语翻译与写作》历年考研真题及详解.pdf
- 博迪《金融学》【教材精讲+考研真题解析】讲义与视频课程【50小时高清视频】.pdf
- 2023年秘书国家职业资格(二级)复习全书【核心讲义+历年真题详解】.pdf
- 2023年秘书国家职业资格(二级)考试题库【历年真题+章节题库+模拟试题】.pdf
- 2023年秘书国家职业资格(三级)考试题库【历年真题+章节题库+模拟试题】.pdf
- 2023年秘书国家职业资格(四级)复习全书【核心讲义+历年真题详解】.pdf
文档评论(0)