- 1、本文档共4页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
2014年考研英语Text3阅读逐句分析
第一段
The US$3-million?Fundamental physics?prize is indeed an interesting experiment, as Alexander Polyakov said when he accepted this year’s award in March. And it?is far from?the only one of its type. As a News Feature article in Nature?discusses, a?string?of?lucrative?awards for researchers have joined the Nobel Prizes in recent years. Many, like the Fundamental Physics Prize,?are funded from?the telephone-number-sized bank accounts of Internet?entrepreneurs. These?benefactors?have succeeded in their chosen fields, they say, and they want to use their wealth to?draw attention to?those who have succeeded in science.
31. The?Fundamental Physics Prize?is seen as _____.
[A] a symbol of the entrepreneurs’ wealth
[B] a possible replacement of the Nobel Prizes
[C] a handsome reward for researchers
[D] an example of bankers’ investments
单词词组搭配
string?[str??](出现2次)n.一串,一系列
lucrative?[?lu?kr?t?v] adj.利润丰厚的
entrepreneur?[?ɑ?ntr?pr??n??r] n.企业家,创业者
benefactor?[?ben?f?kt?r] n.捐助者
Fundamental physics(基础物理学)
be?far from(远非)
be? funded from(由...资助)
draw attention to(吸引..的吸引力)
本段翻译
诚如亚历山大三月领取年度奖时所言,300万美金的基础物理学奖的确是个有吸引力的尝试。该奖也远非同类奖项中的唯一。正如《自然》一篇新闻专题文章所述,近年来一系列面向研究者的丰厚奖项已经加入诺贝尔奖的行列。和基础物理学一样,许多奖项的经费来自因特网企业家的巨额银行存款。据说,这些捐资者在自己选定的领域中获得成功,因而希望用自身财富去吸引人们关注那些在科研领取取得成功的认识。
第二段
What’s not to like? Quite a lot, according to?a handful of?scientists?quoted?in the News?Feature. You cannot buy?class,?as the old saying goes, and these?upstart?entrepreneurs cannot buy their prizes the?prestige?of the Nobels. The new awards are an exercise in?self-promotion?for those behind them, say scientists. They could?distort?the achievement-based system of peer-review-led research. They could?cement?the?status quo?of?peer-reviewed?research. They do not fund peer-reviewed research. They?perpetuate?the myth of the lone genius.
32. The?critics?think that the?new awards?will most benefit _____.
[A] the profit-oriented scientists
[B] the founders of the awards
[C] the achievement-based system
您可能关注的文档
最近下载
- 部编版八年级上册历史基础知识填空.docx
- 小学五年级上全册人自然社会教案可打印.doc
- DB11∕T 1598.3-2019 居家养老服务规范 第3部分:助医服务.docx VIP
- 人教版高中物理电学实验要点总结.pdf VIP
- 普通高中课程标准2023.pdf
- 幼儿园幼儿出游安全应急预案.docx VIP
- 2024浙江省执业药师继续教育答案-中医虚症辨证用药.docx VIP
- DB11_T 1598.2-2019 居家养老服务规范 第2部分:助餐服务.PDF VIP
- 简谱 爱永在 沂蒙山 王传亮.pdf
- 小学一年级音乐下(第三单元 音乐中的动物: 唱歌 咏鹅):C1跨学科学习活动设计-教学方案设计+学生学习成果+学习成果点评[2.0微能力获奖优秀作品].docx
文档评论(0)