- 1、本文档共5页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
硫包衣尿素对水稻养分吸收利用及土壤反应的影响-华北农学报
华北农学报2008, 23( 增刊) : 293297
1 1 2 1 1
汪吉东 , 张永春, 郭巧云 , 朱普平, 胡永红
( 1. , 210014; 2. , 554000)
: , (S U)
:S U 1.20, 1. 11,
1.92, 1.48 ; S U 10.93%~ 22. 23% ,S U
; ,S U ,,
S U ,N (N 0. 15 g/ kg ) (0.66 g/ kg ) ,S U
, S U 11.79%~
20.25% , 57.58% ; S U pH, S U ,
,
:; ; ;
:S511;S145 :A : 1000- 7091(2008) - 0293- 05
Effect of Sulfurcoated Urea on Nutrients Uptake and Utilization
and Soil Reaction of Rice
1 1 2 1 1
WANG Jidong , ZHANG Yongchun , GUO Qiaoyun , ZHU Puping ,HU Yonghong
( 1. Institute of Agricultural Resource and Environmental Sciences,Jiangsu Academy of Agriculture
Science,Nanjing 210014, hina; 2.Agriculture Bureau of Yuping ounty,Yuping 554000, hina)
Abstract: Field together with pot experiments were carried out to study the effect of sulfurcoated urea(S U) and
urea on growth, nutrients uptake,utilization and soil reaction of rice.Results obtained were as following:In the field ex
periment, S U and urea treated rice showed 20% and 11% higher yield than that of control. 92% ,48% of pot experi
ments respectively; Under same nitrogen fertilizer dose, ricefed with S U got 10.93% to 22.23% higher yield than those
of urea due to the greater thousand grain weight; ompared with urea, S U had greater positive effects on rice P absorp
tion.However,while no effects on K absorption was observed.Nitrogen harvest index was increasedwith the increasing of
S U and urea dose.At the same N usage of 0. 15 g/ kg and fertilizer dose of 0.66 g/ kg, S U treated rice got a signifi
cantly higher N harvest index.N use efficiency(NUE) in treatmentswith S U was 11.79% to 20.25% hither than those
of urea,with the greatest NUE at 57.58% .Soil P pH was not significantly decrea
文档评论(0)