村干部职务犯罪案例分析刑事诉讼法专业论文.docxVIP

村干部职务犯罪案例分析刑事诉讼法专业论文.docx

  1. 1、本文档共30页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  5. 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  6. 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  7. 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  8. 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
村干部职务犯罪案例分析刑事诉讼法专业论文

应综合所有证据,如果排除了合理怀疑能确认被告人胡某并没有将该笔钱用于“纵向联 系”,那么应认定其构成职务侵占罪。如果有,则应认定其无罪,并且如果因此线索最 终查获了该领导的受贿罪行,胡某还可以被认定为有立功表现,在量刑时可以对其从轻 或减轻处罚。但若法院不能排除合理怀疑,则只能依据“疑罪从无”认定被告人无罪。 被告人胡某还构成挪用资金罪,应对其数罪并罚。针对当前村干部严峻的犯罪形势,各 级政府应该通过加强村干部的思想预防,完善相应的制度,加大监督力度以及完善相应 法律规范等综合措施来加以遏制。 关键词:村干部;职务犯罪;犯罪性质;司法认定;预防对策 Abstract Recently, the situation of the job-related crimes of the village cadres becomes more critical. This criminal phenomenon is not only a challenge to the rule of law in China, but also seriously affects the smooth construction of the new rural. To curb this serious criminal situation, the deep analysis study of this topic is particularly important. For this reason, the case of the encroachment of the highway grants of the village committee and misappropriation of land compensation costs have been chosen to the example to make a detailed reading of the legal issues related the job-related crimes of the village cadres. The paper is divided into five parts. The first part is to put forward the name of the case. It directly shows that the theme of this article is about the job-related crimes of the village cadres, and that this article focuses on the study of the job-related crimes of the village cadres. Specifically, it is about the case of the encroachment of the highway grants and misappropriation of land compensation costs of the village committee. The second part is the description of the case. It tells the specific circumstances of the case. The case tells that the village cadres take the grants that the government has given to the village committee through the “false note”. The village committee director argues that he has used the other nine thousand Yuan to give to the leader to ensure the grants. Besides, he has used the crops compensation fee and the ground attachments fee of the land compensation costs to gamble, not has returned until now. The third part is the focus of controversies, based on the fact appeared in the case. The prosecution, the defendant and the judge proposed

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

peili2018 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档