和肾络法治疗糖尿病肾病终末期效果及对各实验指标影响.docVIP

和肾络法治疗糖尿病肾病终末期效果及对各实验指标影响.doc

此“医疗卫生”领域文档为创作者个人分享资料,不作为权威性指导和指引,仅供参考
  1. 1、本文档共14页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  5. 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  6. 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  7. 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  8. 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
和肾络法治疗糖尿病肾病终末期效果及对各实验指标影响

和肾络法治疗糖尿病肾病终末期效果及对各实验指标影响   [摘要] 目的 探讨和肾络法治疗糖尿病肾病终末期的效果及对各实验指标的影响。 方法 回顾性分析2014年1月~2015年6月山东省青岛市海慈医疗集团81例糖尿病肾病终末期患者资料,根据治疗方法分成治疗组(46例)和对照组(35例)。对照组患者采用西医常规治疗,治疗组在对照组治疗基础上加用和肾络法中药汤剂治疗。4周为1个疗程,3个疗程后评价临床疗效。观察两组患者治疗前后的临床疗效、临床症状积分以及对各实验指标的影响。 结果 治疗3个月后,治疗组总有效率和显效率均显著高于对照组(P 0.05),治疗后治疗组的症状积分显著低于对照组(P 0.05),对照组的Scr水平显著降低(P 0.05)。与治疗前比较,两组患者治疗后TG、LDL-C、HDL-C均明显改善(P 0.05),且治疗后治疗组患者TG、LDL-C、HDL-C改善显著优于对照组(P 0.05)。 结论 在西医治疗基础上加用和肾络法治疗糖尿病肾病终末期能提高效果,改善患者的肾功能及血脂等指标,改善临床症状,对延缓终末期糖尿病肾病的发展,具有良好作用。   [关键词] 糖尿病肾病;终末期;和肾络法;西医;肾功能;临床症状积分   [中图分类号] R587 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-4721(2016)10(c)-0189-04   [Abstract] Objective To investigate the efficacy of renal collaterals methods in the treatment of diabetic nephropathy of end-stage and its influence on the experimental indexes. Methods Data of 81 cases of patients with diabetic nephropathy of end-stage treated in Qingdao Haici Medical Group from January 2014 to June 2015 were analyzed retrospectively. According to the treatment method patients were divided into the treatment gorup (46 cases) and the control group (35 cases). Patients in the control gorup were given conventional Western medicine treatment, patients in the treatment gorup were given renal collaterals method herbal soup on the basis of the control group, 4 weeks as one course of treatment. The clinical effects were evaluated after 3 courses of treatment. The clinical effects, clinical symptom scores before and after treatment and its influence on the experimental indexes were observed. Results After 3-month of treatment, the rates of efficiency and total efficiency in the treatment group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P 0.05). After treatment, the clinical symptom scores of the treatment group were lower than those of the control group, with statistically significant differences (P 0.05) in the treatment group; while the control group of Scr level decreased significantly (P 0.05) after treatment. Compared with before treatment, after

文档评论(0)

bokegood + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档