中国英语学生语用缓和语学习之实证研究.docVIP

　　中国英语学生语用缓和语学习之实证研究----英语范文论文 --Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1Leading to the Present Study 当然，基于这样的认识，应该是日常沟通清晰，精确，尽可能明确的。鹧鸪和舒德森认为相反，其他学者看到了硬币的另一面。例如，陈科坪指出，模糊语言通常发生在消息中（伍铁平91 qtd.）。也就是说，模糊语言的功能之一。其实，语用学的研究也揭示在这个问题上，通过从务实的角度探讨缓和。缓和，麻雀虽小，自然语言的设备，在日常沟通中出现非常频繁和广泛。当我们与他人沟通，我们都知道，不同的社会背景和缓和往往根据具体情况量身定做。作为一个非常特殊的语言现象，缓和举行务实的调查作为一个非常有趣的话题。正如格赖斯提出，当我们与他人沟通，我们通常遵守合作原则，辖四个附属格言：质量格言，箴言，数量关系的格言和礼仪格言（何自然49-51 qtd.）。Naturally, based on thisunderstanding, daily munication should be as clear, precise and unambiguous as possible.Contrary to only occurred inmessages (qtd. in 伍铁平 91). That is to say, vagueness is one of the features of language.Actually, researches on pragmatics also have shed light on this issue via probing intomitigators from a pragmatic perspective.Mitigators, as small but natural linguistic devices, occur very frequently and unication. anner maxim (qtd. in 何自然 49-51). 然而，使用在同一时间的缓和违反这四个准则。对于违反数量格言，话语缓和提供了冗余信息。在质量格言，缓和修改信息通常表示说话人的主观因素或失实扬声器的言外点。缓和关系格言通过提供语义无关的信息互动沟通的命题进展，违反。关于礼仪格言，话语与缓和冗长。这样的违反格赖斯格言的贡献缓和峨山耐人寻味的语用学的研究课题，重大的学术价值。Hoitigators breaches these four maxims at the same time. For the violation of Quantitymaxim, utterance itigators provides redundant information. In terms of Quality maxim, the information modified by mitigators usually represents the speaker’s epistemic uncertaintyor untrue of the speaker’s illocutionary point. Mitigators breach Relation maxim by providingsemantically irrelevant information to the propositional progression in the interactionalmunication. Concerning Manner maxim, utterance itigators is verbose. Suchviolations of the Gricean maxims contribute to the significant academic value of mitigators asan intriguing research topic in pragmatics. In this study, these maxims-breaching mitigators ustbe in an effective itigating modificationof language according to different situations in order to keep the munication harmoniousand smooth. They seem to be redundant at first sight. Hoed, the ability to successfully prehend and producemitigated face