- 1、本文档共2页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
下载2016年度阅卷评委对参赛报告之评语-Reviewers
Hong Kong Institute of Certified Public Accountants
QP Case Analysis Competition 2016 (PRC)
Reviewers Comments
Comments on the Written Reports
CONTENT
Strengths Weaknesses
Clear problem identification, clear Need to analyze more about corporate
discussion and decision focus. governance, tax structure and
Well-organized composition, most of the government policy.
necessary components are included and SWOT analysis for the three strategies
have been put in the right places. are not based on objective and accurate
In-depth analysis on the present situation environment.
and proposals. Conclusion for choosing strategy is
Supported with research findings and lacking of a sound theoretical and
data. practical justification.
Identify problems clearly and articulation It is not practical for suggesting a
of solutions. solution but without considering the
The analysis of strategy choice has company current financial situation.
strong logic and sufficient The solution proposed is not matching to
reasonableness, which makes the the company high quality product and
conclusions of the investigation have a brand name mission and strategy.
high degree of feasibility and Has not showed enough consideration
persuas
文档评论(0)