两种方案治疗慢性荨麻疹的成本-效果分析.pdfVIP

两种方素。台疗慢性等麻珍的成本…效果分析 赵袭*，能 峰(深圳市人民医院，深圳市 518020) 中固分费号 R956 文献标识码 B 文章编号 1672 币 2124(2010)01 -∞40 晴 02 摘 要 目的:比较氯赏他定和氯马斯汀两种方案治疗慢性等麻莎的经济效果。方法:采用药物经济学原理对两种治疗方案进 行成本叩效果分析。结果:氯雷他定组和氯马斯汀纽治疗慢性等麻掺第 28 夭的有效率分别为 93.8% 、 9 1. 59岛，两级[鸣先..1.籍，除暴 并 (P 0. 05); 成本-效果比 (CI应)分别为 3.81 、 3.47 。与氯马斯汀组相比，氯常他定组 4号增加卢个单位效果需多花费 17.2 元。 结论:两种方案治疗慢性等麻莎有效...元显著性差异，但氯马斯汀组成本效果比优于氯ìt他发组。 关键诩 氯雷11!!.定;氯马斯 rr; 复方甘 j在峻静;成本效采分析;慢性尊麻莎 Two Therapeutic Schemes for Chronic Urticaria: Cost - EfTectiveness Analysis ZHAO Kui * , XIONG .Feng (Shenzhen Municipal Peoples Hospital , Shenzhen 518020 , China) ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE: To compare the oost - effectiveness between loratadine and clemastine in the treatment of chronic urticaria. METHODS: The C08t - effectiveness of the 2 treatment schemes was evaluated by u8ing the principle of pharmacoeconomics. RESULTS: The effective ra阳 of loratadine and clemastine ín for chroníc urticaria were 93. 8 % and 91. 5 % , respectively (P O. 05) , and their cost 叩 effectiveness ratios (C/E) were 3. 81 and 3. 47 , respectívely. The cost for every one unit increment of effectiveness in loratadine group was 17. 2 yuan higher a8 against clemastine group. CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference between these two schemes ín clinical effective rate in the treatment of chronic urticaria, but the cost 响 effectiveness ratio of the clemastine is superior to that of loratadine. K阻Y WORDS Loratadine; Clemastine; Compound Glycyrrhizin; Cost - effectiveness analysis;