6132009- universityof pittsburgh(- - - - - 6132009 universityof pittsburgh).doc

6132009- universityof pittsburgh(- - - - - 6132009 universityof pittsburgh).doc

  1. 1、本文档共20页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
6132009- universityof pittsburgh(- - - - - 6132009 universityof pittsburgh)

6/26/2009 Global Anti-Representationalism? I Huw Price is one of the boldest and most original voices of pragmatism in the generation after Richard Rorty and Hilary Putnam. Two particularly interesting ideas he has been developing recently are subject naturalism and global expressivism. The term by contrast to which “subject naturalism” is defined is “object naturalism,” which is the kind usually associated with the term ‘naturalism.’ It aspires to a particular kind of semantic account of some vocabulary or discursive practice. More particularly, it offers a representational account. That is, it says what objects and properties that vocabulary talks about, what range of facts it states or expresses. That representational semantic strategy accounts for the object side of object naturalism. The naturalism side is a matter of the semantic metavocabulary that is employed, in part to specify the ontology: what kinds of things the vocabulary in question represents. It is to be a naturalistic vocabulary. That is a genus that comprises a variety of species, including at least the vocabulary of fundamental physics, vocabularies of the special natural sciences, or, least demandingly, ground-level empirical descriptive vocabulary, including both observational and theoretical vocabulary. By contrast, subject naturalism is the project of using a vocabulary that is naturalistic in one of these senses, not as a semantic metavocabulary, but as what in Between Saying and Doing I call a “pragmatic metavocabulary.” That is, it is to be used to describe what the discursive practitioners who deploy the vocabulary in question do, the practices they engage in, or the abilities they exercise, in virtue of which they count as using that vocabulary. The idea is to formulate in the favored vocabulary necessary and sufficient conditions for doing what one needs to be doing in order thereby to be saying what can be said using the vocabulary, rather than (as with a semantic metavoc

文档评论(0)

bgl001 + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档