农村生活污水土地处理示范项目的可推广性研究_以上海为例.pdfVIP

35 5 Vol35 N o5 2010 5 ENV IRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND MANAGEMENT M ay 2010 : 1674- 6139( 20 10) 05- 0080- 03 以上海为例 郝前进, 郭思, 张苹 ( , 200433) ! : 农村生活污水处理示范项目建造的目的就是为了大面积地推 , 但是一个适宜推 的示范项目至少应 该满足技术可行成本有效和管理便捷的要求以上海市汇中村和双津村为例, 从技术适用性成本有效性管 理便捷性三方面对农村生活污水土地处理示范项目的可推 性进行了分析研究发现, 采用土地处理系统的 示范项目, 技术上可以基本满足农村生活污水处理的要求, 管理上非常便捷, 可以由农民自行维护, 比较有利于 推 ; 但从成本有效性方面来看, 现有示范项目还存在较大的成本下降空间在实现成本有效的条件下, 农村 生活污水土地处理示范项目将具有很强的推 空间 : 农村生活污水; 土地处理; 示范项目; 可推 性 : X 829; X321; X 196 : A The Pop larization Analysis of R ral Dom estic Sew age Land T reatment Projects: A Case St dy in Shanghai and So thern Jiangs A rea HaoQ ianjin, G o S,i Zhang Ping (Department of Environm entalScience and Eng ineering, F danU niversity, Shangha i200433, China) A bstract The p rpose of demonstration items ∀constr ction is pop larization, while in practice, the effect of demonstration i tem s# ability to pop larization is not idea,l beca se there is ins fficiency in the applicability of the technology, the validity of the cost and the convenience of the managemen.t This article takesH izhong V illage and Sh angjin V illage in the city of Shanghai for example, to analyze the ability of pop larization of land treatment techniq es for r raldomesticwastewater in terms of technical ap plicability, cost validity andmanagement convenience. Res lts indicate that the technicalapplicability andmanagement convenience are in favor ofpop larization, while the cost validity is controversial. Provided establishing the canonical constr ction criterion of land treatment for r ral domestic sewerage to red ce nnecessarywaste, aswell as the nparalleled advantage of its technology and managemen